¯¯¯¯¯ Come Dancing in sequence ~ a review of sequence dance CDs ~ |
Contents | Introduction
| Notes
| New Additions
| Alphabetical Listing | Rankings
| Music Titles | Statistics | Links | Feedback
|
This page is best viewed using Internet Explorer: optimise appearance
with View - Zoom control
CDs are listed alphabetically in order of the
artists’ forenames. CDs that comprise
compilations of various artists are listed together in a category entitled Various. Individual tune tracks that are vocal in nature
are designated with a bracketed V in the lists.
As CDs become available to us, individual
tracks are checked to ensure that the music is arranged in 16-bar
sequences. Most CDs sold as sequence
dance CDs do in fact have all tracks in sequence. Where this is not so the tracks are Graded X in the listings below. Occasionally, a track may be marketed
as being in sequence but is out of phase in places: for example, a new tune may
start halfway through a sequence. Such
tracks are similarly Graded X. In addition
there are some good general dance CDs marketed that have only a few of their
tracks in sequence. These CDs are also
being included in the listings if the tracks in sequence are considered
worthwhile.
The number of 16-bar sequences in each track is
determined and entered under the tabular heading Seq. The number of 16-bar sequences in a track is
a much more useful indicator than the highly variable track length given in
minutes and seconds (see Statistics). Regretfully, the once common practice of
specifying the number of sequences in each track has largely disappeared. Where the track as a whole is not in
sequence, the notional number of 16-bar sequences is given. A plus sign (+) indicates that a
track ends with other than a 16-bar sequence.
Dancing to these tracks results in a frustratingly unfinished dance:
such tracks are best avoided. Care
should be taken by MCs to ensure that only tracks with an even number of 16-bar
sequences are used for the few dances that have a 32-bar sequence.
Individual tracks are checked to see if they
have the required four-bar introduction.
Tracks that do not have a clear four-bar introduction are Graded X.
Such tracks are also best avoided as they only confuse dancers. Only in rare cases where the music is of
compelling beauty should their use be considered. A suitable warning to dancers of the short/long introduction is
then essential, although still likely to cause confusion to some.
Some tracks have breaks in the music such that
dancers may think the dance is finished, or the phrasing is such as to produce
a phantom ending. These tracks are Graded
X: we consider them unsuitable for
sequence dancing.
The original arranger of a sequence dance
always specifies the tempo of the music to be used. While some latitude in tempo is to be expected, too much
variation detracts from the enjoyment and beauty of the dance. A quickstep danced at 51 bpm rather than the
usual 48 bpm will soon have the elderly puffing and certainly detracts from
most dancers’ enjoyment. Likewise with
sambas and mambos, etc. The Highfield
Waltz has less appeal when danced at 29 bpm rather than the 31 bpm specified by
the arranger. Many other examples could
be given. It is surprising then that
the tempos of the CD tracks are not always specified by the
manufacturer/supplier.
The tempo of individual tracks was determined
semi-digitally using the CD player display to measure the time difference
between the start of the first sequence and the end of the last sequence. The tempo was thus averaged over the whole
track. Where this differed from that
given by the CD supplier the number of bars over a 60-second random period were
counted as a check. Where the
determined value is mid-way between whole numbers the value is quoted as that
given with the original CD if this is within 0.5 of the determined value. Such cases occur most often with Rumbas
where a tempo of 26 or 27 bpm is determined to be 26.5 bpm. In all other cases, the determined bpm was simply rounded to the nearest whole
number. Where
the bpm
found in practice differs from the bpm given
with the original CD the tempo is highlighted as bpm
rather than bpm. We suspect that these discrepancies are often attributable
to simple ‘typing errors’ in the supplier’s printed material. It is surprising how often these
discrepancies continue to occur in newly released CDs. Where CD suppliers do not give the bpm, only
the digitally determined bpm are listed: the corresponding column in the tables for the
supplier’s data is then left blank.
All the above factors are matters of factual
measurement that are independent of personal likes or dislikes. More debatable is the assessment of a
track’s musical appropriateness. Our
assessments in this field are clearly personal so we give here the three
over-riding factors that are uppermost in our minds when we listen and dance to
each music track. First, the music must
inspire us when we start the dance.
Second, the music must be appropriate to the dance. As an example, we often listen and dance to
Tango music that is in perfect time but lacks the passion that should
characterize the dance. At other times
we unfortunately dance to music that meanders with no sense of direction, or
that is more appropriate to a funeral than a time of joy and happiness. Third, we must leave the floor with a sense
of fulfillment having danced to good music that has been uplifting and welcomes
us back again to the dance floor. In
some cases, where there is more than one tune on a track, the quality of the
tunes varies widely. In more recent
reviews (as from 06/12/07) these differences are highlighted.
Attention was also paid to the sound levels
throughout each CD track. Too much
variation in sound levels can be frustrating, especially to the hard of hearing
at some distance from the speakers in the dance hall. Variable sound levels often add to the enjoyment of music in
general (as witnessed at any concert) but in the sequence dance area, such
variations should be minimal. CD tracks
have not been graded separately on this aspect because of the difficulty in
objective measurement and classification.
Those with computer facilities may find it worthwhile adjusting the
sound levels where necessary to achieve a more even output. However, this should not be necessary with
good CDs as the problem can be readily overcome when preparing the original
master CD.
Tracks that do not measure up to the above
requirements are Graded X. This Grade covers the ‘multitude of
sins’ briefly discussed above. The
comparatively high proportion of such tracks on some CDs may appear high. Some dancers may therefore consider that too
high a standard has been set here. But
other dancers can perhaps be forgiven for wishing that all their sequence dance
music reached the relatively high standard of the remaining music that is Graded
P (good music). Some of the music tracks are so good to
dance to that we consider them worthy of a higher Grade: hence the
multiple ticks. We stress that these
musical Grades are subjectively determined and ill defined but we trust
that they reflect the views of most dancers.
Visitors to this site who possess any of the CDs reviewed so far may
like to compare their own assessments with our Grades. We do not expect perfect agreement but Feedback would be appreciated. The feedback received to-date has been very
encouraging. Feedback on sequence dance
CDs in general will always be appreciated.
In particular we would like to hear about any artists not listed so far
whose CDs measure up to the general quality of those listed here.
As noted in the Statistics section, in addition to the 148 CDs
reviewed so far, a further 38 CDs were considered unacceptable for inclusion in
this website. In a few cases, CDs that
would normally fall in this unacceptable category have been included only
because they contain one or more very good tracks of music.
The listed information should be
useful in choosing CDs and also in preparing sequence dance programmes,
especially when the CD music is stored on a computer or other digital device as
is now common. The speed and sound
levels can then be readily adjusted where required when the CDs are initially
loaded onto the computer (assuming this is legal in your country). Hopefully, such problems will eventually be
routinely overcome at source when sequence dance CDs are first produced.
Useful digital data on the above
characteristics of sequence dance CDs are summarized in the Statistics
section.
Contents | Introduction
| Notes
| New Additions
| Alphabetical Listing | Rankings
| Music Titles | Statistics | Links | Feedback
|
|
|
|
Page last revised 17 July 2010 |
|
DISCLAIMER: While every effort
has been made to ensure that all the information provided in this website is
correct, no responsibility is accepted for any errors or omissions that may be
present or losses that may ensue to users of the information. The
omission of any particular sequence dance CD from this site does not by itself
imply that the CD is unsatisfactory: it may simply be that it has not yet been
assessed.