|
Come Dancing in sequence ~ a review of sequence dance CDs ~ |
|
Contents | Introduction
| Notes
| New Additions
| Alphabetical Listing | Rankings
| Music Titles | Statistics | Links | Feedback
|
Ranking of CDs
Table 1 ranks CDs reviewed in terms
of their decreasing overall quality. Table
2 ranks the CDs in terms of
their decreasing ‘useable’ playing times.
Only the ‘top’ 100 CDs in each group are included in these tables. The rankings are intended only as rough guides
to quality. These tables are current as
at 30 November 2011. See Explanatory
Notes below.
Table 1: Overall quality of CDs expressed as a notional %
Table 2: ‘Useable’ playing times of CDs
Explanatory Notes
It is difficult to assess the
overall quality of individual sequence dance CDs. Many of the factors involved are subjective in nature (see Notes
section). Still less is it easy to
objectively compare the overall quality of CDs. Notwithstanding, an attempt has been made in Table 1 to list all CDs
reviewed in decreasing order of their overall quality. The quality is expressed as a notional
percentage. The method used for
calculating this notional percentage is as follows.
Where all tracks on a given CD are graded P and have no X, X, X, or X grades the CD is given an overall assessment of 100%. This percentage is reduced on a pro rata basis by any track that is considered unsuitable for sequence dancing (that is, has one or more X, X, X, or X grades irrespective of whether the track is graded P). As an example, a CD with four of its 20 tracks considered unsuitable for sequence dancing, the remaining 16 being graded P, would be given an overall assessment of 80%. Tracks that are graded PP/PPP with no X, X, X, or X grades are treated as equivalent to two/three P tracks. As an example, a CD with four of its 20 tracks graded PP (the remaining 16 being graded P) would be given an overall assessment of 120%. This system of overall assessment is admittedly somewhat arbitrary but appears to give a reasonable comparative measure of a CD’s overall quality.
Table 2 lists all CDs reviewed in decreasing
order of the total playing time of all tracks on a given CD that have no
X, X,
X, or X
grades. This playing time is designated
‘useable’ playing time. It is another
measure of a CD’s overall
quality or ‘value for money’ if you accept that only tracks that have no
X, X,
X, or X
grades are acceptable for sequence dances.
It takes no account of the relative quality of music on individual tracks.
|
Contents | Introduction
| Notes
| New Additions
| Alphabetical Listing | Rankings
| Music Titles | Statistics | Links | Feedback
|
|
|
|
Page
last revised 30 November 2011
|
|
DISCLAIMER:
While every effort has been made to
ensure that all the information provided in this website is correct, no
responsibility is accepted for any errors or omissions that may be present or
losses that may ensue to users of the information. The omission of any
particular sequence dance CD from this site does not by itself imply that the
CD is unsatisfactory: it may simply be that it has not yet been assessed.
© Colin Rammell